O aquecimento da ONU

Se alguém aí ainda acredita em jornalismo e, pior ainda, na maior organização (supra)estatal corrupta e ideológica do mundo (a ONU) e tiver paciência para ler em inglês, sugiro a leitura do texto abaixo.

O autor faz referência a Bjorn Lomborg, autor de um livro que eu estou lendo e que se chama “O ambientalista cético”. Eu juro que queria mandar um texto em português, mas isso é impossível, já que não vivemos em um país, digamos, honesto.

É uma vergonha o que esses cientistas da ONU estão fazendo, assustando as pessoas que não estão e nem podem estar por dentro de um assunto tão complexo, querendo fazer todo mundo acreditar que o mundo vai acabar e que somos culpados por isso. E uma vergonha ainda maior é o que os jornalistas fazem: reportagens absurdamente unânimes, que consideram o tal relatório do IPCC como verdade universal, não se dando nem mesmo ao trabalho de pedir a opinião da comunidade científica. Isso não é jornalismo, é propagação, propaganda mesmo.

http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0207/jkelly020207.php3
Message to UN scaremeisters: The planet is always getting either warmer or cooler

By Jack Kelly

For the last two weeks the weather in Pittsburgh has been typical for January — it’s snowed almost every day. And for the first time this winter I’ve heard complaints about the weather at work. I heard none during our unseasonably warm December.

I note this to put in perspective the latest scare report on global warming from the United Nations. Average global temperatures could rise by 2 to 4.5 degrees Centigrade (3.6 to 8 degrees Fahrenheit) by 2080 if carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere double, said news accounts of a draft report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. This could result in flooding in coastal areas, and water shortages that could affect billions of people.

Hypothetical piled upon hypothetical, based on computer models which cannot duplicate the actual climate of the present or the recent past.

There is no question the planet is getting warmer. In the 20th Century, average global temperatures rose by 0.6 degrees Centigrade (1 degree Fahrenheit). Most of that warming took place before 1940, a fact which those who attribute warming chiefly or entirely to human activity usually ignore.

But the planet is always getting either warmer or cooler. The current warming trend began about 300 years ago, in the depths of the Little Ice Age (1350-1900). The Little Ice Age followed the Medieval Warm Period (800-1300), when global temperatures were about as warm as the IPCC predicts they might be in 2080. In those days Greenland was actually green, and wine grapes grew in Nova Scotia. Leaks of the IPCC report coincided with publication of two books which link climate change to a long, moderate solar cycle.

In “Unstoppable Global Warming Every 1,500 Years,” Fred Singer and Dennis Avery present evidence of 600 moderate warmings in the last million years.

In “The Chilling Stars,” Henrik Svensmark and Nigel Calder discuss how cosmic rays amplify small changes in the sun’s irradiance, creating 1-2 degree Centigrade cycles in temperatures on earth.

Sunspot activity has reached a 1,000 year high, said scientists affiliated with the Max Planck Institute in Gottingen, Germany and the Institute for Astronomy in Zurich, Switzerland, in a 2004 report. More sunspots mean warmer; fewer mean colder. Solar radiation has increased by 0.05 percent per decade since the 1970s, concluded a NASA-funded study in 2003.

Alarmists attribute warming to rising levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. But CO2 accounts for only about 0.03 percent of the earth’s atmosphere, and less than 10 percent of the greenhouse effect. Only about 14 percent of the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere comes from burning fossil fuels.

Dr. Habibullo Abdussamatov, head of the space research laboratory at the Pulkovo Observatory in St. Petersburg, Russia, says the alarmists have confused cause and effect. As solar radiation warms the earth, CO2 is released into the atmosphere from the world’s oceans, he said last month.

There’s considerable evidence of global warming on Mars, Dr. Abdussamatov said. Since there are no people on Mars, it’s clear the warming there and here is due to the sun, he said.

Every change in climate has pluses and minuses. But for humans, warmer is usually better. The Medieval Warm Period was a time (mostly) of peace and plenty; the little Ice Age (mostly) of starvation and war.

As evidence mounts it is the sun and not man that is responsible for global warming, the alarmists grow more strident, and try to stifle debate. Al Gore cancelled a long standing interview with a Danish newspaper last month because he would have had to appear with Bjorn Lomborg, a former member of Greenpeace, but a global warming skeptic. Heidi Cullen, an “expert” for the Weather channel, said meteorologists who disagree with her about global warming should be decertified.

In their efforts to capture public attention, some of his colleagues have oversold global warming, said Kevin Vranes, a climate scientist at the University of Colorado. “Some of us are wondering if we have created a monster,” he told the Houston Chronicle.

If Dr. Abdussamatov is right, we’d better hope there is some truth to the man made global warming hypothesis. Solar irradiation has peaked and begun to fall, he said. This will result in a cooling period of about 50 years, beginning around 2012.

~ by Evandro Ferreira on February 5, 2007.

2 Responses to “O aquecimento da ONU”

  1. Eu desconfio de qualquer coisa que venha da ONU.
    Que o mundo vai acabar, pode até ser; que será [já é] culpa do homem, aí é bem capaz de ser terrorismo ecológico…

  2. Olá Evandro,
    Ha muito tempo que leio Bjorn Lomborg, e uma coisa apreendi com ele os estudos podem ser verdadeiros e nas melhores intenções mas ha sempre um contraponto que é omitido. Por exemplo , pode faltar água, (não aqui no Brasil) no Kuait, mas este país tem tanto petroleo que pode pagar os sistemas que tornam a água salgada doce , e assim o petróleo compensa a falta d’água. Por outro lado foi somente com situações trágicas que a ONU conseguiu um pequenino ,movimento nos USA maior poluidor do mundo. Mas ja existem soluções até baratas para a maioria dos problemas de água.
    No Texas , estado mais poluido dos Estados unidos, vc cconsegue comprar um Hummer con desconto do IPVA , presente do governo Bush para que vc compre o carro mais poluidor do país . Se vc quer comprar um carro ecológico terá que pagar o dobro do IPVA. Evandro ! Os americanos precisam ser assustados se não…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: